NEBOSH IG2 (Risk Assessment) Overview

IG2 is the practical assessment component of the NEBOSH International General Certificate (IGC) in Occupational Health and Safety. This assignment requires candidates to conduct a real-life risk assessment based on workplace hazards, applying the knowledge gained from IG1 (Management of Health and Safety).

Key Elements of IG2

  1. Description of the Workplace – Provide details of the site (e.g., high-rise construction, oil & gas facility).
  2. Hazard Identification – Identify hazards across different categories (physical, chemical, mechanical, ergonomic, etc.).
  3. Risk Evaluation – Assess the level of risk using a qualitative risk matrix.
  4. Control Measures – Recommend practical solutions following the hierarchy of controls.
  5. Review and Monitoring – Explain how risk control measures will be monitored and reviewed.

Sample IG2 NEBOSH Assignment

Risk Assessment for a High-Rise Construction & Oil & Gas Facility

1. Workplace Description

Name of Organization: XYZ Construction & Oil Services
Location: Offshore Oil Rig and Urban High-Rise Construction Site
Type of Work:

  • High-rise construction: Structural steel erection, scaffolding, concrete work
  • Oil & gas: Drilling, maintenance, welding, confined space work

2. Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment

Hazard CategoryHazard DescriptionWho is at Risk?Current ControlsRisk LevelRecommended Actions
Working at Heights (Scaffolding & Crane Work)Fall from scaffolding or craneConstruction workers, crane operatorsSafety harnesses, guardrailsHighEnsure scaffolding is inspected daily, use double lanyards for harnesses, train workers on fall arrest systems
Fire & Explosion (Oil & Gas Site)Flammable gas leaks & welding sparksOil rig workers, weldersFire-resistant PPE, gas detection systemHighImplement hot work permit system, increase ventilation, ensure fire extinguishers are accessible
Confined Space WorkOxygen deficiency & toxic gas buildupMaintenance workers in tanks/pipelinesGas monitoring, entry permits, ventilationHighImplement continuous gas monitoring, emergency rescue plans, and forced ventilation
Heavy Machinery & Lifting OperationsStruck-by or crushed-by equipment (cranes, forklifts)Operators, riggers, pedestriansSignalers, exclusion zones, PPEMediumConduct load testing, improve operator training, enforce strict traffic control measures
Chemical Exposure (Oil & Gas Processing)Inhalation of benzene & hydrocarbonsProcess technicians, engineersRespirators, SDS compliance, ventilationMediumImprove PPE enforcement, ensure MSDS availability, train workers in spill response
Ergonomic HazardsManual lifting, repetitive tasksConstruction laborers, techniciansBasic lifting trainingMediumProvide mechanical lifting aids, ergonomic training

3. Risk Control Recommendations

  • Engineering Controls: Improve ventilation, use mechanical lifting equipment, secure scaffolding.
  • Administrative Controls: Implement safety training, enforce hot work permits, conduct emergency drills.
  • PPE: Mandate fire-resistant clothing, full-body harnesses, respiratory masks.

4. Review & Monitoring Plan

✅ Conduct weekly safety inspections and toolbox talks.
✅ Use HSE software to track incidents and near-misses.
Review control measures quarterly and update based on new risks.


Final Thoughts

This IG2 assignment covers high-rise construction and oil & gas industry hazards, demonstrating a practical risk assessment approach. It follows NEBOSH guidelines and can be adapted to different industries. 🚧🔥 

The Oval Office Confrontation, TRUMP VS Zelensky, US President TRUMP and Ukrainian President Meeting

The Oval Office Confrontation


On February 28, 2025, a highly anticipated meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office escalated into a public confrontation, drawing global attention and raising questions about U.S.-Ukraine relations.

The Oval Office Confrontation

Initially convened to discuss a U.S.-Ukraine minerals agreement, the meeting quickly deteriorated. President Trump criticized Ukraine's reliance on U.S. military support and questioned President Zelenskyy's commitment to peace negotiations. The exchange became heated, leading to an abrupt end to the meeting. Trump remarked that Zelenskyy was "not ready for peace involving America," signaling a potential shift in U.S. foreign policy.

Historical Media Clashes Between Presidents and Prime Ministers

Tensions between world leaders are not unprecedented. Notable instances include:

  • Richard Nixon and Dan Rather (1974): During a press conference, President Nixon sarcastically asked CBS correspondent Dan Rather, "Are you running for something?" highlighting the strained relationship between the administration and the press.

  • John F. Kennedy and John Diefenbaker: Despite public decorum, the relationship between President Kennedy and Canadian Prime Minister Diefenbaker was notably strained, affecting bilateral relations.

Is Public Confrontation Beneficial?

Public clashes between leaders can have mixed outcomes:

  • Pros:

    • Transparency: Offers the public insight into genuine diplomatic dynamics.
    • Accountability: Holds leaders responsible for their positions and actions.
  • Cons:

    • Diplomatic Strain: Can damage bilateral relationships and hinder cooperation.
    • Public Perception: May lead to decreased confidence in leadership and international stability.

U.S. Objectives and President Trump's Stance on Ukraine

The U.S. has historically aimed to support Ukraine's sovereignty, counter Russian aggression, and promote democratic values. However, President Trump's recent actions suggest a pivot towards redefining U.S. interests, focusing on tangible returns from alliances and questioning prolonged military support without clear outcomes.

President Zelenskyy's Perspective

President Zelenskyy seeks continued U.S. support to counter Russian advances and secure Ukraine's territorial integrity. He emphasizes the need for security guarantees and sustained military assistance. Zelenskyy resists concessions that could undermine Ukraine's sovereignty or reward aggression, maintaining a firm stance against compromising on critical national interests.

Reasons Behind President Trump's Aggressive Approach

Several factors may have contributed to President Trump's assertive demeanor during the meeting:

  • Frustration Over Stalemate: Perceived lack of progress in resolving the conflict despite significant U.S. support.

  • Domestic Political Considerations: Desire to showcase a tough stance on foreign aid and ensure that U.S. contributions yield measurable benefits.

  • Strategic Realignment: Intent to recalibrate U.S. foreign policy towards prioritizing direct national interests over extended commitments.

Global Reactions

The confrontation elicited varied international responses:

  • European Leaders: Expressed strong support for Ukraine, emphasizing the importance of unity against aggression.

  • Critics: Argued that the U.S. approach could embolden adversaries and weaken democratic alliances.

In conclusion, while public confrontations between leaders can shed light on underlying tensions, they also risk undermining diplomatic relations and global stability. The recent clash between Presidents Trump and Zelenskyy underscores the complexities of international diplomacy and the delicate balance required to navigate such challenges.

Arab Israel Collaboration Video