The messiest babies may be the fastest learners, according to a new
study from the University of Iowa. Non-solid foods like applesauce or
oatmeal can be difficult for babies to recognize because they look very
different depending on if they’re in a bowl, a spoon, or a puddle.
Researchers found that the babies who played with their food the most
(and made the biggest mess) were the most successful at recognizing the
names of gooey substances when later presented with them in different
shapes or quantities. The researchers believe that being open to
exploration may boost both early vocabulary and later cognitive
development. Will you be more tolerant of a messy high chair after
learning about the benefits of playing with your food?
Study shows toddlers learn words for nonsolids better when getting messy in a highchair.
Attention, parents: The messier your child gets while playing with food in the high chair, the more he or she is learning.
Researchers
at the University of Iowa studied how 16-month-old children learn words
for non-solid objects, from oatmeal to glue. Previous research has shown
that toddlers learn more readily about solid objects because they can
easily identify them due to their unchanging size and shape. But oozy,
gooey, runny stuff? Not so much.
New research shows that changes
if you put toddlers in a setting they know well. In those instances,
word learning increases, because children at that age are “used to
seeing nonsolid things in this context, when they’re eating,” says
Larissa Samuelson, associate professor in psychology at the UI who has
worked for years on how children learn to associate words with objects.
“And, if you expose them to these things when they’re in a highchair,
they do better. They’re familiar with the setting and that helps them
remember and use what they already know about nonsolids.”
In a paper published in the journal Developmental Science,
Samuelson and her team at the UI tested their idea by exposing
16-month-olds to 14 nonsolid objects, mostly food and drinks such as
applesauce, pudding, juice, and soup. They presented the items and gave
them made-up words, such as “dax” or “kiv.” A minute later, they asked
the children to identify the same food in different sizes or shapes. The
task required the youngsters to go beyond relying simply on shape and
size and to explore what the substances were made of to make the correct
identification and word choice.
Not
surprisingly, many children gleefully dove into this task by poking,
prodding, touching, feeling, eating—and yes, throwing—the nonsolids in
order to understand what they were and make the correct association with
the hypothetical names. The toddlers who interacted the most with the
foods—parents, interpret as you want—were more likely to correctly
identify them by their texture and name them, the study determined. For
example, imagine you were a 16-month-old gazing at a cup of milk and a
cup of glue. How would you tell the difference by simply looking?
“It’s the material that makes many nonsolids,” Samuelson notes, “and how children name them.”
The
setting matters, too, it seems. Children in a high chair were more apt
to identify and name the food than those in other venues, such as seated
at a table, the researchers found.
“It turns out that being in a
high chair makes it more likely you’ll get messy, because kids know they
can get messy there,” says Samuelson, the senior author on the paper.
The
authors say the exercise shows how children’s behavior, environment (or
setting), and exploration help them acquire an early
vocabulary—learning that is linked to better later cognitive development
and functioning.
“It may look like your child is playing in the
high chair, throwing things on the ground, and they may be doing that,
but they are getting information out of (those actions),”
Samuelson
contends. “And, it turns out, they can use that information later.
That’s what the high chair did. Playing with these foods there actually
helped these children in the lab, and they learned the names better.”
“It’s not about words you know, but words you’re going to learn,” Samuelson adds.
Lynn
Perry, who helped design the study and analyze the data as part of her
doctoral studies at the UI, is the first author on the paper. Johanna
Burdinie, who was an UI undergraduate during the project, is a
contributing author.
Notes about this psychology and learning research
The National Institutes of Health (grant number: R01 HD045713) funded the research. Burdinie was funded by a fellowship from the Iowa Center for Research for Undergraduates.
No comments:
Post a Comment